It needs a real job in the trip
We look for clear roles: breakfast anchor, destination dinner, downtown hotel base, neighborhood fallback, or daytime stop that improves the whole weekend.
The site does not publish raw scraped lists or generic city inventory. Each public Mykonos page is built from source verification, editorial fit, and practical usefulness. A place should earn a real role in the trip, not just qualify for a category.
Independent Mykonos, Greece travel publisher. The methodology favors clarity, source quality, and public usefulness over maximum coverage.
A Mykonos place usually needs to pass more than one test before it becomes a visible page, let alone a recommendation.
We look for clear roles: breakfast anchor, destination dinner, downtown hotel base, neighborhood fallback, or daytime stop that improves the whole weekend.
Business-controlled or official sources are preferred whenever possible for location, contact, operating context, and other core factual details.
A place should reduce decision noise. If it adds clutter without improving what the reader can actually decide, it is not a strong public fit yet.
The public site is built on normalized data, but the underlying checks stay tied to real sources, review windows, and correction paths.
Each live business record should have a stable identity, address, website, phone path, and freshness metadata before it is trusted as a public page.
Guides should cite the checked sources that support the role they assign to a place, especially when that role shapes where someone stays, eats, or spends time.
Mykonos restaurants and hotels change. Freshness windows exist so that facts can be revisited rather than treated as permanently correct.
Recommendations should hold up in real visitor situations, not only in category lists or promotional copy.
Our local recommendations are based on a mix of editorial research, source checks, field notes where available, local context, and feedback from people who know or have used the place.
When useful, we speak with local residents, hospitality professionals, repeat visitors, and independent contributors to understand how a place works in real visitor situations. We use this input to judge whether a recommendation is practical, consistent, and useful for the guide's intended audience.
We may also consider private feedback about customer experiences. Private comments are treated as confidential: we do not publish names, identifying details, screenshots, or direct quotes without permission. Private feedback is used only as an internal editorial signal, and we look for repeated patterns before relying on it.
A place is recommended only when the overall evidence supports it: location fit, consistency of experience, service reliability, value for the intended visitor, and alignment with the guide's purpose. Paid placement, partnership interest, or owner outreach does not guarantee recommendation.
A public publisher should explain this line clearly, not bury it behind generic support language.
A business is recommended because it improves the Mykonos product, not because it started a support or partnership conversation.
Factual corrections, official source updates, and partnership outreach can improve data quality, but they do not guarantee editorial recommendation.
If a fact or a role cannot be supported honestly, it should be corrected, generalized, or removed rather than left looking fresh by default.
If a listing is incomplete, inaccurate, or out of date, corrections should be sent through the public contact path with the page URL and the official source that should be checked.
For corrections, partnership questions, or publisher contact, use infoelpremier.com. If the request concerns a listed business, include the page URL, your role, and the official source to review.